Southern Metropolitan Intern Sweet Reporter Chen Yangkai’s luxury clothing, the quality is not necessarily consistent with the brand awareness. On July 30, the Beijing Consumer Association issued the “Comparison Test Report of 100 Clothing” to detect samples to purchase from Beijing Xidan Dayue City, Juntai Department Store, Hanguang Department Store, Xidan Mall, Wangfujing Department Store, Ginza Mall, Mall Mall (Dongzhimen Store), Wanda Plaza (Fengtai West Rail Camp) and other shopping places and a Tmall Shopping Platform Dongfang Xinxianshen Sports Store, which involves 76 brands, and the price of samples ranges from 39.9 yuan to 3,800 yuan.
The results showed that 25 samples did not meet the requirements of national and related standards. Among them, there are 8 samples in the top, 6 samples of casual pants, 11 samples of jeans, and 5 samples only do not meet the standard requirements. Among them, Armani’s 3,800 yuan top, the hair and the ball project did not meet the standard requirements. Only, a 649 yuan jeans (nominal brand: only Olli; model number: 119132527j19) dyeing fastness does not meet the relevant explicit standards.
Get rid of
Sexual does not meet the standard
As well as
Brands such as POLP SPORT
There are five main items that do not meet the requirements of relevant standards in this comparison test, namely product use instructions, fiber content, dry frictional coloring fastness, dampness resistance coloring, washing color, and hairy and kicking. Raising the ball is the most likely. It refers to the phenomenon of fibrous friction and tensile force during wearing. In this comparison test, a total of 11 samples of the sample did not meet the relevant explicit standard requirements.
These include a top produced by George Armani (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. (nominal brand: Giorgio Armani; model number: 6XSB03 FW16) and a sweater dress produced by Anzheng Fashion Group Co., Ltd. (nominal brand: JZ JUZUI ; Model number: JWXD31412), the prices are 3800 yuan and 990 yuan, respectively.
In addition, the nominal brand is PGA Tour’s wool sweater, nominal brand is Dai Ying’s woolen sweater, nominal brand is Tren Diano’s casual pants, nominal brand is Polo Sport men’s sweater, nominal nominal nominal The brand is a women’s clothing, the nominal brand of Diaina, a pants, a nominal brand of Mo Buyu, and a nominal brand of G.JAMEI. The brand of Phablon Fanbren’s women’s pants all showed that the spheres were not in line with the standard.
8 sample dyeing fastness does not meet the standard
ONLY, Fan Belle, etc.
The staining fastness refers to the firmness of fabric dyeing. The staining fastness is poor, and the color loss or shade will occur, which not only affects the beauty but also affects health. This experiment has the product’s water resistance, acid -resistant sweat stain coloring, alkaline -resistant sweat stain coloring, dry friction color fastness, wet friction coloring fastness, wash -resistant and light -resistant color accuracy after detection and found found. The color fastness of 8 samples does not meet the requirements of relevant explanation standards, involving three items: dry friction coloring, moisture friction color fastness, and washing color target. Among them, 7 of the 8 samples are trousers, ranging from 199 yuan to 1242 yuan.
Among them, a jeans (nominal brand: IIIVIVIVINIKO; model number: i1910841527a) staining the solidity of the nominal jeans (nominal brand: IIIVIVIVINIKO; Jeans (nominal brands: only Olli; model number: 119132527j19) staining fastness that is nominated as Tongzhi Fashion (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. does not meet the relevant explicit standards. In addition, the nominal brand is a blue embroidered waist cotton pants, the nominal brand is a women’s clothing, the nominal brand of the nominal brand of the patch/blue denim wide -leg pants The label brand is OTR’s women’s jeans, the nominal brand is Red British women’s pants, Phablon Fanbrey’s women’s pants are detected that the dyeing fastness has not reached the relevant explicit standard.
5 sample fiber content is unqualified
Brands such as Kenzo, Hugo Boss are on the list
The fiber content reflects the material composition of clothing products, determines the performance of clothing products, and is one of the main reference indicators when consumers buy. In this comparison test, the fiber content of 5 samples does not meet the relevant explicit standard requirements. The main manifestation of the situation is that the deviation of the fiber content exceeds the regulations, the multi -standard and leakage of the fiber component.
Among them, the nominal brand is a coat of Hugo Boss Hugos Bos, a jeans of Kenzo, a casual pants of Trendia NO, a women’s clothing of Kadadan as Caddama The nominal brand is named Yufule’s male home pants.
Instructions for use do not meet the standard
, Caddy and other brands
Product use description is a description of the overall situation of the product, the main credential for consumers to buy and use goods, and it is also an important basis for consumers to safeguard their rights and interests. In this comparison test, the use instructions for the use of 8 samples do not meet the relevant explicit standard requirements. The price ranges from 199 yuan to 1528.2 yuan. Explain the inconsistency of the labeling content and the unspeakable product category.
These include jeans produced by Beijing Dongfangjuanzi Clothing Co., Ltd. (nominal brand: Lanbna Lang Bi’an; model number: 19AH12305). In addition, the nominal brand is a coat of Hugo BOSS Hugosbos, a label brand of Caddidan, a nominal brand of Timmax’s jeans, and a nominal brand of OTR Women’s jeans and nominal brands are PLAY LOUGNE’s CMM contrasting color micro -laid jeans and nominal brands are American Eagle Outfitters.
Fake the truth, fill it in the second time
Armani was fined 420,000 yuan
Nandu reporter tried to call George Armani (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. on the eyes of Tianyan, but no one answered. It is understood that in December 2017, the Shanghai Huangpu District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau had imposed administrative penalties on the company, saying that it was mixed, fake, fake, and charged in the product. Yuan, ordered it to stop sales.
The comparative test does not meet the relevant standard samples